In December, Microsoft agreed to make documentation relating to its workgroup server products available to the Samba team under a non-disclosure agreement.
The non-disclosure agreement was brokered on behalf of Samba by the Protocol Freedom Information Foundation (PFIF), an organisation that seeks to facilitate the exchange of free and open source software information. PFIF, which paid a one-off fee of 10,000 euros for the documentation, is part of the Software Freedom Law Center.
While Samba’s developers must keep that documentation confidential, they can implement code reflecting it within open source projects.
“In the early ’90s we had a very good engineering relationship with them,” Samba author Andrew Tridgell said during a presentation on clustering Samba at linux.conf.au in Melbourne.
“Then there was a period in the wilderness for about 10 years.” During that time, Samba’s developers had to rely on reverse-engineering to make the product work, which was difficult when dealing with entirely undocumented features.
Microsoft, Samba, Protocol, Open-Source, Open Source, Co-operation, Settlement