September 30, 2008
12:02 am
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) exploit traced on ING, YouTube, MetaFilter and NYT
Researchers from Princeton University revealed their discovery of four major Websites susceptible to the silent-but-deadly cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack -- including one on INGDirect.com’s site that would let an attacker transfer money out of a victim’s bank account.
ING, YouTube, and MetaFilter all have since fixed these vulnerabilities after being alerted to them by the researchers, but as of press time, the fourth, The New York Times, still harbored a CSRF flaw on its site that would let an attacker cull and abuse email addresses from online subscribers to the site.
Loading
No comment yet
-
Pingback from 1botchedPHP » Preventing CSRF Attacks with Static Nonce says:December 6th, 2008 at 3:59 pm
[...] I caught an article about a paper “Cross-Site Request Forgeries: Exploitation and Prevention” written by [...]
