<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gmail Got A New Feature Called &#8220;Mail Fetcher&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ditii.com/2006/12/09/gmail-got-a-new-feature-called-mail-fetcher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ditii.com/2006/12/09/gmail-got-a-new-feature-called-mail-fetcher/</link>
	<description>Technology, Blogging, Computer, Hardware, Software, Networking, Web, Media, LifeStyle, Gadgets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:13:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Franciov</title>
		<link>http://www.ditii.com/2006/12/09/gmail-got-a-new-feature-called-mail-fetcher/#comment-1343</link>
		<dc:creator>Franciov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 23:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ditii.com/blog/2006/12/09/gmail-got-a-new-feature-called-mail-fetcher/#comment-1343</guid>
		<description>[...] Considering what Gmail is and what Gmail may be, and considering that now you can both send to and receive from a non-Gmail account, in my opinion there is no one else (looking at Yahoo! Mail and MSN Hotmail) that can reach Gmail in terms of usability and flexibility, and of webspace availability for free. And itâ€™s still a beta!

Moreover I do not think implementing an offline version of Gmail would be a good idea [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Considering what Gmail is and what Gmail may be, and considering that now you can both send to and receive from a non-Gmail account, in my opinion there is no one else (looking at Yahoo! Mail and MSN Hotmail) that can reach Gmail in terms of usability and flexibility, and of webspace availability for free. And itâ€™s still a beta!</p>
<p>Moreover I do not think implementing an offline version of Gmail would be a good idea [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
